Commodifying learning? Ethical communication violations and professional boundaries of Indonesian influencer lecturers on social media

  • Robby Aditya Putra Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
  • Dete Konggoro Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
  • Maulida Fitri Institut Agama Islam Tulang Bawang, Indonesia
  • Osman Koroglu Epoka University, Albania
Keywords: Influencer lecturers, Ethical communication, Professional boundaries, Social media in education, Commodification of learning

Abstract

Purpose − This study explores the phenomenon of the commodification of learning by influencer lecturers in Indonesia using social media. The main objective of this study is to analyze how lecturers’ practices in sharing content on social media can trigger ethical communication violations, blur professional boundaries, and affect students’ learning experiences as well as the protection of their rights in the digital era.

Method − This study adopts a qualitative research design to examine the phenomenon of influencer lecturers in Indonesia, focusing on the commodification of learning, ethical communication violations, and professional boundaries on social media. Data was collected through a literature review and digital observation of lecturers’ activities on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube during the period from 2022 to 2025. A purposive sampling technique was used to select lecturers who actively produce educational content and demonstrate significant audience engagement. The research data consists of publicly available posts, videos, captions, and interactions, which were analyzed using iterative thematic analysis. The main themes identified include the commodification of learning, ethical communication violations and the blurring of professional boundaries. Ethical considerations were maintained by anonymizing all observed accounts. The analysis of this study is based on the Source Credibility Model, Kantian communication ethics, and professional Stephen J. Ball’s concept of performance.

Findings − The findings reveal that the commodification practices of influencer lecturers are concretely manifested through packaging students’ expressions, emotions, and interactions as digital content oriented toward attention. This condition reduces the fundamental values of education. As a result, the use of social media by influencer lecturers not only has the potential, but clearly leads to violations of communication ethics, blurred professional boundaries, and a decline in academic credibility. This study emphasizes the urgent need for a clear separation between the role of lecturers as educators and as public figures. Influencer lecturers are required to consciously establish, internalize, and maintain clear ethical boundaries to uphold professionalism and academic integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argenti, P. A. (2019). Corporate Communication and Reputation Management.
Carpenter, J. (n.d.). Children and the New Media: Example of “Sharenting” Specified to Instagram. New Media, 50–64.
Dwisuardinata, I. B. N., & Darma, G. S. (2023). The Impact of Social Influence, Product Knowledge, and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) Towards Purchase Intention on Alcoholic Beverage in Bali. Binus Business Review, 14(1), 1–11.
Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Menteşe, M. (2012). What is Happening to the Students on Social Media? Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 7(2), 104–109.
Hornby, A. S. (2020). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
Johnson, R. (2022). Kant’s Moral Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant, I. (1989). The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1988). The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2(3), 225–232.
Liu, Y. (2010). Social Media Tools as a Learning Resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1).
Ornstein, A. C., & Levine, D. U. (2005). Foundations of Education. Houghton Mifflin.
Piliang, A., Bastian, E., & Muchlish, M. (2023). Use of Enabling Levers and Constraining Levers to Radical Innovation: Intervention of Knowledge Sharing and Technological Turbulence. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12).
Piliang, Y. A. (2021). Dunia yang Dilipat: Tamasya Melampaui Batas-Batas Kebudayaan. Jalasutra.
Schroeder, S., Shelton, C., & Curcio, R. (2021). Creating the Consumer Teacher: Edu-Influencers and the Figured World of Teaching.
Shelton, C., Curcio, R., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Instagramming Their Hearts Out: Teacher Influencers on Instagram. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1486–1492.
Smith, R., & Bowers, R. (2012). A. S. Hornby and 50 Years of the Hornby Trust. ELT Journal, 66(1), 1–9.
Tari, E. (2023). Metaverse Challenges and Opportunities in the Gospel Message. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 6(2), 510–518.
Published
2026-04-16
How to Cite
Putra, R. A., Konggoro, D., Fitri, M., & Koroglu, O. (2026). Commodifying learning? Ethical communication violations and professional boundaries of Indonesian influencer lecturers on social media. Indonesian Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 4(1), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.51214/ijemal.v4i1.1870