Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Literacy among University Students in Indonesia: A Case Study
Abstract
The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has transformed learning practices, prompting concerns about their influence on students’ critical thinking, originality, and independent engagement with academic materials. This study explores the perceived impact of AI on academic literacy among Indonesian university students, with particular attention to critical thinking, originality, and independent learning. Employing a qualitative approach, the study captures students' experiences and perspectives, revealing that while AI tools such as ChatGPT and Grammarly are perceived to enhance learning efficiency, they may also diminish deeper engagement with academic content and critical thinking processes. Many participants reported a tendency to rely on AI-generated summaries, which they associated with reduced independent analysis and creativity. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that when AI tools are integrated with thoughtful pedagogical strategies, they can support the development of academic literacy within ethical boundaries. The study underscores the importance of implementing AI literacy programs and ethical guidelines to foster responsible and reflective use of AI in academic contexts.
References
Abbasi, B. N., Wu, Y., & Luo, Z. (2025). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on curriculum development in global higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 547-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13113-z
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chang, C. Y., Lin, H. C., Yin, C., & Yang, K. H. (2025). Generative AI-assisted reflective writing for improving students’ higher order thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 270-285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48810719
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Gera, J., Marwaha, E. B., Thareja, R., & Jain, A. (2023). Predicting and Improving Behavioural Factors that Boosts Learning Abilities in Post-Pandemic Times using AI Techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0141127
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Google Scholar
Hwang, W. Y., Nurtantyana, R., Purba, S. W. D., Hariyanti, U., Indrihapsari, Y., & Surjono, H. D. (2023). AI and recognition technologies to facilitate English as foreign language writing for supporting personalization and contextualization in authentic contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 1008-1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221137253
Ji, Y., Zhan, Z., Li, T., Zou, X., & Lyu, S. (2025). Human-Machine Co-creation: the Effects of ChatGPT on Students' Learning Performance, AI Awareness, Critical Thinking, and Cognitive Load in a STEM Course towards Entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2025.3554584
Jw, C. (2009). Research design-qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE, Ca; ofprnia. Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational action research, 18(4), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524745
Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5614-5632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Google Scholar
Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.536972
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Google Scholar
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Rao, M. N., & Al-Obaidi, J. A. (2025). Embracing How AI Responsibly Empowers Students and Faculty in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives. In Emerging Technologies Transforming Higher Education: Instructional Design and Student Success (pp. 1-32). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3904-6.ch001
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. sage. Google Scholar
Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & society, 36(1), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 639-653. Google Scholar
Tight, M. (2022). Internationalisation of higher education beyond the West: challenges and opportunities-the research evidence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(3-4), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041853
Wahn, B., Schmitz, L., Gerster, F. N., & Weiss, M. (2023). Offloading under cognitive load: Humans are willing to offload parts of an attentionally demanding task to an algorithm. Plos one, 18(5), e0286102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286102
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Yu, J. H., Chauhan, D., Iqbal, R. A., & Yeoh, E. (2024). Mapping academic perspectives on AI in education: trends, challenges, and sentiments in educational research (2018–2024). Educational technology research and development, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10425-2
Zhai, N., Huang, Y., Ma, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Can reflective interventions improve students’ academic achievement? A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101373
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Wu, L., & Li, J. (2025). Digital Transition Framework for Higher Education in AI-Assisted Engineering Teaching. Science & Education, 34(2), 933-954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00575-3
Copyright (c) 2025 A Fadel Muhammad, Nur Astiana Hidayat Ardi, Nurhaliza Nitswat, Sri Hardianti Nur, Annisa Zhalila Raza, Fatjri Nur Tajuddin, Anzar Aquil, Moch. Nur Syahrus Syahbana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BIP is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, according to which:
1) Authors retain copyright with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
