Validity and Reliability of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status Adaptation: The Rasch Model Approach
Abstract
Ego identity plays a crucial role in shaping an individual’s self-concept, career decisions, and social relationships. Accurately measuring ego identity status is essential for understanding identity formation and promoting healthy psychological development. This study examines the validity and reliability of the adapted Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status (OMEIS) using the Rasch Model, a contemporary psychometric approach that enhances measurement precision. A sample of 431 university students participated in this study, with data collected through an online questionnaire. Rasch analysis was employed to assess item fit, rating scale effectiveness, person reliability, and item difficulty levels. The results indicate that the adapted OMEIS demonstrates strong structural validity and high item reliability (0.99), although person reliability (0.63) requires improvement. The Wright Map analysis confirms the instrument’s ability to capture variations in ego identity, while item difficulty analysis highlights areas for potential refinement. Findings suggest that the Rasch Model provides a robust framework for validating psychological instruments, ensuring their applicability across diverse populations. This study contributes to the refinement of identity measurement tools and underscores the importance of advanced psychometric methodologies in psychological research
Downloads
References
Al-Hemidi, K., Al-Enezi, H., والدرجة, الكلية, والهوية, االجتماعية, الهوية, اإلناث لصالح, المفتاح, وتعليق, ية, الكلمات, تحقيق, هوية, & تشتت, الهوية،. (2020). Forming Ego Identity and Its Relationship With Social Responsibility Among Northern Border University Students’ in Saudi Arabia. The International Journal for Research in Education, 44(1), 284–3
Andrich, D. (2016). Rasch rating-scale model. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 75–94). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1(2), 183–197.
Berg, K. (1992). Measuring balance in the elderly: Development and validation of an instrument.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2013). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer.
Branje, S., De Moor, E. L., Spitzer, J., & Becht, A. I. (2021). Dynamics of identity development in adolescence: A decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 908–927.
Brekke, M., Berg, R. C., Amro, A., Glavin, K., & Haugland, T. (2022). Quality of Life Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties for Use in Parents During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Systematic Scoping Review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02011-y
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson.
Duan, J., Ren, X., Luo, W., & Tian, X. (2021). The Influence of Family Social Class on Career Choice: From the Perspective of Social Cognition. Environment and Social Psychology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v6.i2.1386
Fadhilah Umar, N. (2019). The Development of The Instrument of Politeness in The Language Used by Teachers in The Learning Process.
Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1095.
Good, M., & Adams, G. R. (2008). Linking academic social environments, ego-identity formation, ego virtues, and academic success. Adolescence, 43(170).
Hasan, A. (2023). EGO IDENTITY FORMATION: FROM THEORY TO LIFE. Iksad Publication.
Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., & Steffens, N. K. (2021). Life change, social identity, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 635–661.
Jeon, & Sun Myong. (2024). The Effect of Ego resilience program on University students’ self-esteem and career maturity. 53(1).
Kim, S., Lee, K., & Liu, W. (2023). Chewing and Swallowing Abilities of Persons Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Instruments. Innovation in Aging, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad052
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
Linacre, J. M. (2016). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS® MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. (No Title), 719.
Luck‐Sikorski, C., Rossmann, P. D., Topp, J., Augustin, M., Sommer, R., & Weinberger, N. (2021). Assessment of Stigma Related to Visible Skin Diseases: A systematic Review and Evaluation of Patient‐reported Outcome Measures. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 36(4), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17833
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551.
Maree, J. G. (2022). The psychosocial development theory of Erik Erikson: critical overview. The Influence of Theorists and Pioneers on Early Childhood Education, 119–133.
Mendoza, N. B., & Yan, Z. (2021). Validation of a Subject-Specific Student Self-Assessment Practice Scale (SaPS) Among Secondary School Students in the Philippines. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282921994374
Mohamed, N., Sulaiman, W. S. W., Halim, F. W., & Masodi, M. S. (2021). An Initial Analysis of Reliability and Validity of a Personality Instrument Using the Rasch Measurement Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/11251
Nielsen, T., Martínez‐García, I., & Alastor, E. (2021). Critical Thinking of Psychology Students: A Within‐ and Cross‐cultural Study Using Rasch Models. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12714
Rodríguez-Grande, E.-I., Díaz-Galvis, M.-L., Medina-Prieto, P.-C., Vargas-Pinilla, O.-C., Torres-Narváez, M.-R., & Rodríguez-Malagón, N. (2023). Instruments for the Assessment of Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome: A Scoping Review . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3200679/v1
Santiago, P. H. R., Milosevic, M., Ju, X., Cheung, W., Haag, D., & Jamieson, L. (2022). A Network Psychometric Validation of the Children Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (COHQoL) Questionnaire Among Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Children. Plos One, 17(8), e0273373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273373
Sinring, A., Aryani, F., & Umar, N. F. (2022). Examining the Effect of Self-Regulation and Psychological Capital on the Students’ Academic Coping Strategies during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2).
Stolt, M., Kottorp, A., & Suhonen, R. (2021). A Rasch Analysis of the Self-Administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-Fhai). BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00625-z
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim komunikata.
Suyitno, S., Jatmoko, D., Primartadi, A., Ratnawati, D., & Abizar, H. (2024). The Role of Social Support on Vocational School Students’ Career Choices. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (Ijere), 13(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26269
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Post-examination analysis of objective tests. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 447–458.
Tornabene, R. E., Lavington, E., & Nehm, R. H. (2018). Testing validity inferences for Genetic Drift Inventory scores using Rasch modeling and item order analyses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 11, 1–16.
Umar, N. F. (2021). Digital Career Planning Models for Z Generation. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 23(2), 91–100.
Vankerckhoven, L., Raemen, L., Claes, L., Eggermont, S., Palmeroni, N., & Luyckx, K. (2023). Identity formation, body image, and body-related symptoms: Developmental trajectories and associations throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(3), 651–669.
Wang, Y. (2024). The Application Effect of the Rasch Measurement Model Combined With the CRF Model: An Analysis Based on English Discourse. Plos One, 19(8), e0309001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309001
Wilson, M. (2023). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Routledge.
Wright, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 97–116.
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022). Assessing Teachers’ Strategies in Formative Assessment: The Teacher Formative Assessment Practice Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(5), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829221075121
Zhu, G., Wang, Z., Guan, P., Zhu, Y., Li, J., Liu, Y., Shi, F., & Wang, S. (2021). A Rasch Analysis of the 10-Item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in the Urban-Rural fFinge of China. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-441385/v1
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Fadhilah Umar, M. Fiqri Syahril, Salsabila Nasution, Nurfaidah Ardis, Humairah azzahrah, Muhammad Rafli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
