Validitas dan Realibilitas Instrumen Teori Pilihan Karir Holland di Indonesia

  • Weni Anggraini Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Fandy Kurniawan Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Ungaran, Indonesia
  • Susilawati Susilawati Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Afra Hasna Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Keywords: career choice, career preparation, holand's career scale

Abstract

Validity and reliability are the main topics in every research instruments. It is important how to create research instrument that is connected to the construct being measured. In this article, the authors tested the validity and reliability of Holland's career instrument Indonesian version. The participants involved are in the period of career preparation and choice, within an educational institution or a job, but has not yet had satisfaction with their career. The participants' age range from 15 to 27 years. The validity test is carried out using the conventional validity type, where the item is declared valid if the correlation coefficient is ≥ 0.3. The results showed 43 items were declared valid and 5 items were declared invalid while the reliability coefficient found is 0.906. Based on the results, Holland's career instrument Indonesian version in a good instrument to measure career preparation and career choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azwar, S. (2011). Tes Prestasi: Fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cummings, T.G & Worley, C.G. (2009). Organization Development & Change, 9th edition. USA: Cengage Learning

Djaali., dkk. 2000. Pengukuran Dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana.

Farh, Jiing-lih., Leong, Frederick T, L., & Law, Kenneth S. (1998). Cross-Cultural Validity of Holland’s Model in Hong Kong. Journal Of Vocational Behavior 52, 425– 440 https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1631

Foutch, H., McHugh, E. R., Bertoch, S. C., & Reardon, R. C. (2014). Creating and using a database on Holland’s theory and practical tools. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(1), 188-202 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1069072713492947

Gati, I & Peretz, L.A. (2011). Internet-Based Self-Help Career Assessments and Interventions: Challenges and Implications for Evidence-Based Career Counseling. Journal of Career Assessment August 2011 vol. 19 no. 3 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710395533

Hoile, P.C. (2000). Improving Person-Environment Fit: Increasing Job Satisfaction by Matcing Employees Preferred Levels of Arousal to Job Complexity Within Holland’s Model of Occupational Types. Desertasi. USA: Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company

Holland Code Test dari personality-testing info courtesy Interest Item Pool (IPP). Retrieved from Google Scholar

Hurtado Rúa, S. M., Stead, G. B., & Poklar, A. E. (2019). Five-Factor Personality Traits and RIASEC Interest Types: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(3), 527-543. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1069072718780447

Lent, R. W., Sheu, H.-B., & Brown, S. D. (2010). The self-efficacy—interest relationship and RIASEC type: Which is figure and which is ground? Comment on Armstrong and Vogel (2009). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019039

Lenz, A.S., Soler, I. G., Dell’Aquilla, J., & uribe, P.M. (2017). Translation and cross cultural adaptation of assessments for use in counseling research. Measurement and Evaluastion in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 224-231. http://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1320947

Leung, S. A. (2008). The big five career theories International handbook of career guidance (pp. 115-132): Springer.

McKay, D. A., & Tokar, D. M. (2012). The HEXACO and five-factor models of personality in relation to RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 138-149. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.006

Meireles, E., Primi, R. (2015) Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessing Holland’s Career Types. Journal of Paideia 25(62), 307-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504

Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basic of social research: Qualitative and quantitative qpproaches, second edition. Pearson Education, Inc.

Purwanto, Edi. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ratri, Widiasih Diana (2016). Validasi Holland Self Directed Search (Sds) Form Cp Sebagai Alat Ukur Minat Karir. Naskah Publikasi: Program Magister Psikologi Profesi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. https://www.academia.Edu/34601886/

Sheu, H.-B., Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Miller, M. J., Hennessy, K. D., & Duffy, R. D. (2010). Testing the choice model of social cognitive careertheory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.015

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2000. Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologis. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Sverko, I., Babarovic, T. (2006) The Validity of Holland’s Theory in Croatia. Journal of Career Assessment. 14(4), 409-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706288940

Widodo, P. B. (2006). Reliabilitas dan validitas konstruk skala konsep diri untuk mahasiswa Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro, 3 (1), 1-9.

Wijaya, Fitria (2012). Hubungan Antara Kematangan Karir dengan Motivasi Belajar pada Siswa Kelas X MAN Cibinong. http://publication.gunadarma.ac.id

Published
2020-09-30
How to Cite
Anggraini, W., Kurniawan, F., Susilawati, S., & Hasna, A. (2020). Validitas dan Realibilitas Instrumen Teori Pilihan Karir Holland di Indonesia. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 2(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.51214/bocp.v2i2.34