Chain Epistemologis Mufasir Pesantren Terhadap Interpretasi Aḥrūf Muqaṭṭa’ah Perspektif Historis
Abstract
The debate on interpretation of aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah is still debated by commentators to this day. Some scholars do not interpret aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah with the argument that these verses are sirr al-Qur'ān and mutasyabihat verses. Others argue that aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah must have a meaning that needs to be explored and interpreted as an effort to show the aspect of guidance (huda) in the Qur'an. This study does not attempt to clash the two groups above. The author focuses on the historical aspects of the meaning of aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah and its epistemology. Through Abdul Mustaqim's periodization mapping model, it can be concluded that the interpretation of aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah has been made since the early era of Islam (Prophet Muhammad's phase). In this phase, the interpretation of aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah, apart from coming from insiders, was also carried out by outsiders of Muslims. Meanwhile, from the perspective of Abid al-Jabiri's epistemology, there was almost no significant epistemological development from the early to the modern phase. Each period continues to use the bayani epistemology model, with one of the characteristics of the interpretation model through history being the dominant current. As for the form of interpretation of aḥrūf muqaṭṭa'ah, it can be categorized into three models of history, language analysis, and numerical formulation (ḥisāb al-jummal). These three models also influence the interpretations of Indonesian mufasirs.
References
Abdul Mustaqim. Dinamika Sejarah Tafsir al-Qur’an. Yogyakarta: Adab Press, 2014.
Abdul Rohman, Ali. “Kajian Huruf-Huruf Misterius Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Samawat 01, no. 01 (2017): 21.
Abū Layst al-Samarqandy. Bahr al-Ulūm. Vol. 3. Bairut: Dār Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1993.
Abu Qasim al-Zamakhsari. al-Kashaf ’an H}a>qa>iq Ghawamidh al-Tanzil. Vol. 1. Bairut: Dar Kutub al-Arabi, 1407.
Amir, Abdul Muiz, dan Fahmi Gunawan. “Diskursus Penafsiran Ayat Al-Hurûf Al-Muqaththa‘Ah: Studi Analisis Tekstual dan Kontekstual.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 43, no. 1 (30 Desember 2019): 21. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v43i1.615.
Anni, Dhur, dan Lukman Hakim. “The Meaning Of The Reception Of The Letters MuqaṬṬa’ah In Ḥizb Al-NaṢr By Abû Al-Ḥasan Al-Shâdhilî.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 21, no. 2 (29 Juli 2020): 273. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2102-02.
‘Azizah, Alifatul. “Penafsiran Huruf Muqata’ah (Telaah Kritis Penafsiran Imam al-Qusyairi Tentang Ha }mi>m Dalam Latha’if al-Isyarat).” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, 2014.
Bahri, Samsul. “Bayani, Burhani Dan Irfani Trilogi Epistemologi Kegelisahan Seorang Muhammad Abid Al Jabiri.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 11, no. 1 (20 April 2017). https://ejournal.up45.ac.id/index.php/cakrawala-hukum/article/view/186.
Cholily, Naufal. “Kritik atas Pandangan Theodor Noldeke tentang al-Hurûf al-Muqatta‘ah dalam al-Qur’an.” MUTAWATIR 4, no. 1 (10 September 2015): 70. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.1.70-86.
Fakhrezi, Muhamad Fahmi, Moch. Arif Bijaksana, dan Arief Fatchul Huda. “Implementation of Automatic Text Summarization with TextRank Method in the Development of Al-Qur’an Vocabulary Encyclopedia.” Procedia Computer Science, 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2020, 179 (1 Januari 2021): 391–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.021.
Fayrūzābādy, Muhammad bin Ya’qu>b al-. Tanwīr al-Miqbās min Tafsīr Ibn Abbās. Bairut: Dār al-Kutūb al-‘Ilmiyah, tth.
Ghmari, Rachid. “The Mysterious Disjointed Letters in The Qur’an: Evidence of Divine Authorship,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12311.60327.
———. “The Mysterious Disjointed Letters in The Qur’an: Evidence of Divine Authorship,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12311.60327.
Hadikusuma, Wira. “Epistemologi Bayani, Irfani dan Burhani Al-Jabiri dan Relevansinya Bagi Studi Agama Untuk Resolusi Konflik dan Peacebuilding.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syi’ar 18, no. 1 (2 Januari 2018). https://doi.org/10.29300/syr.v18i1.1510.
Hayati, Nurfitriani. “Epistemologi Pemikiran Islam ‘Abed Al-Jabiri Dan Implikasinya Bagi Pemikiran Keislaman.” Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic & Social Studies 3, no. 1 (15 Juli 2017): 65. https://doi.org/10.30983/islam_realitas.v3i1.211.
Ilyas, Atik Fikri. “Rationalization The Reposition of The Meaning of Mutasyabih on Muqata’ah letter.” Jurnal Penelitian Hadist dan Tafsir 7, no. 1 (2020): 16.
Küçük, Hülya. “A Brief History of Western Sufism.” Asian Journal of Social Science 36, no. 2 (2008): 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853108X298752.
Mawdhudi, Abul A’lā. Towards Understanding the Qur’an. Vol. 1. London: The Islamic Fondation, 1988.
Mustafa, Bisri. al-Ibriz li Ma’rifah al-Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Aziz bi al-Lughah al-Jawiyah. Vol. 4. Kudus: Menara Kudus, Tth.
Mustaqim, Abdul. Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: L-Kis, 2012.
Nazarpour, Hamed. “Ibn Barrajān on Disjointed Letters (al-Ḥurūf al-Muqaṭṭa‘a) in the Qur’Ān; a New Perspective and Interpretation.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 9, no. 5 (Mei 2022).
Nguyen, Martin. “Exegesis of the Ḥurūf al-Muqaṭṭaʿa : Polyvalency in Sunnī Traditions of Qur’anic Interpretation.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 14, no. 2 (Oktober 2012): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2012.0053.
Putra, D. I. Ansusa, dan Mohammad Hidayaturrahman. “The Roles of Technology in Al-Quran Exegesis in Indonesia.” Technology in Society 63 (1 November 2020): 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101418.
Qusyairi, Abd al-Kari>m al-. Latha>if al-Ishara>h. Vol. 1. Mesir: Hay’ah Misriyah, tth.
Rabia, Sumera, dan Syeda Sadia. “An Analytical Study of Nodleke and Atto Loth’s Thoughts about Mystical Letters.” Al-Milal: Journal of Religion and Thought 2, no. 2 (26 Desember 2020): 312–34. https://doi.org/10.46600/almilal.v2i2.102.
Ridha, Rasyid. Tafsir al-Manār. Vol. 1. Kairo: Dār al-Manār, 1947.
Sahid, Irfan. “Fawatīḥ al-Suwar: The Mysterious Letter of The Qur’an.” Dalam Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qur’ān. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Sayoud, Halim. “Investigation on the Mystery of the Qur’an’s Disjointed Letters(*).” Quranica International Journal of Quranic 5, no. 3 (2013): 14.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir al-Misbah. Vol. 1. Ciputat Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2005.
Sulaymān, Muqātil bin. Tafsīr Muqātil bin Sulaymān. Vol. 1. Bairut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath, 1423.
Suyūti, Jalāl al-dīn al-. Al-Dur al-Manthūr fī Tafsīr al-Ma’thūr. Vol. 8. Bairut: Dār al-Fikr, 2011.
———. al-Itqān fī ’Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 2015.
Ṭabari, Ibn Jarīr al-. Jāmi’ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Vol. 1. tp: Muasasah al-Risālah, 2000.
Thabari, Ibn Jarīr al-. Tafsīr al-Ṭabari min Kitābih Jāmi’ al-Bayān ’an Ta’wīl Ay al-Qur’ān. Bairut: Muasasah al-Risālah, 1994.
Wahyudi, Wahyudi. “Epistemologi Tafsir Sufi Al-Ghazali Dan Pergeserannya.” Jurnal THEOLOGIA 29, no. 1 (2 September 2018): 85–108. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2018.29.1.2070.
———. “Tafsir Sufi: Analisis Epistemologi Ta’wîl Al-Ghazâli Dalam Kitab Jawâhir Al-Qur’ân.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 26, no. 1 (4 Juni 2018): 44. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v26i1.4243.
Zahid, Moh. “The Fawātih Al-Suwar: A Critique of Classical Categories and New Typology.” Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 20, no. 1 (17 Maret 2022): 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340107.
Zarqānī, Muhammad Abd al-A’dhim al-. Manāhil al-Irfān. Vol. 1. Bairut: Dār al-Kitāb al-’Araby, 1995.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yusuf Mukhlisin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
