Tafsir al-Ṭabarī dan Riwayat Problematik: Pendekatan Intertekstual dalam Tradisi Naratif menurut McAuliffe

  • Ahmad Zaiyadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al Quran Wali Songo Situbondo
  • Kunti Rofikoh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al Quran Wali Songo Situbondo
Keywords: Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, Zainab bint Jahsh, Jane Dammen McAuliffe

Abstract

This article examines the story of the Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ marriage to Sayyidah Zainab bint Jahsh as narrated in QS. al-Aḥzāb: 37–38, employing a narrative-critical approach to Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, with a primary focus on problematic ḥadīths (al-dakhīl) that have shaped interpretations of the text. One of the contested reports suggests that the Prophet ﷺ fell in love with Zainab after seeing her unveiled—an account that lacks a sound chain of transmission and directly contradicts the doctrinal principle of prophetic infallibility (ma‘ṣūmiyyah). Unlike Isrā’īliyyāt, which stem from Judeo-Christian traditions, these problematic reports originate from within early Islamic narratives and were often transmitted uncritically in classical exegesis. Using Jane Dammen McAuliffe’s framework—emphasizing intertextuality and narrative framing—this study argues that classical tafsīr is not ideologically neutral, but shaped by selective citation and narrative construction that can obscure the theological intent of the Qur’anic text. Accordingly, tafsīr is understood not merely as an exegetical explanation of scripture, but as a discursive space where meaning and authority are continually negotiated. The article concludes that a critical re-reading of the Zainab episode is necessary to cleanse it of unsound reports and to reaffirm its Qur’anic purpose: the abrogation of pre-Islamic adoption practices (tabannī) and the establishment of divine law above inherited social norms.

References

Abdulrahman, Mohammed Adnan. “The Future of Hadith Studies in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 8 (27 November 2024): 2792–2800. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4927.

Aburrohman, Asep. “Metodologi Al-Thabari Dalam Tafsir Jami’ul Al-Bayan Fi Ta’wili Al-Qur’an.” Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam 17, no. 1 (19 November 2018): 65–88. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v17i1.8096.

Adawy, Abdillah Amiril, dan Faizah Munjata Salma. “Ad-Dakhîl inTafsir Al-Kasyfu Wa Al-Bayân ’An Tafsîr Al-Qur’ân (Analysis of the Story of Prophet Ayub).” Proceeding International Conference On Islam, Law, And Society 4, no. 1 (24 Februari 2025). https://incoils.or.id/index.php/INCOILS/article/view/230.

Afandi, Mahdi, Abd Kholid, dan Achmad Yafik Mursyid. “Discourse on the Best Interpretation Model: A Critical Review of Traditional Exegesis Products in the Early Era.” QOF 7, no. 1 (30 Juni 2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v7i1.1014.

Baghawī, Muḥammad ibn al-Farrā’ al-. Ma‘ālim al-Tanzīl fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Vol. 3. Bairut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1420. google.

Bayḍāwī, Muḥammad al-Shīrāzī al-. Anwār al-Tanzīl wa Asrār al-Ta’wīl. Vol. 4. Bairut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1418. google.

Boullata, Issa J. Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qur’ān. Psychology Press, 2000. google.

Chak, Farhan Mujahid. “Critiquing the Modern Western Theory of Knowledge and Insights into a Qur’anic Epistemology.” American Journal of Islam and Society 29, no. 4 (1 Oktober 2012): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v29i4.312.

Hilmi, Moh Abdulloh, dan Herfin Fahri. “Judicial Mafia And Its Problems: An Examination From The Interpretation Of Ibn Kathīr On Surah Al-Māidah Verse 8 And Al-Baqarah.” Al Hakam: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues 3, no. 2 (14 November 2023): 161–74. https://doi.org/10.35896/alhakam.v3i2.624.

Himayah, Dewi Malihatil, Qomariyah Qomariyah, Muflikhatul Khoiroh, dan Annisa Putri Wahyu Lestari. “Analysis Of Al-Aṣīl And Al-Dakhil Interpretation Of The Story Of Prophet Solomon’s Trial QS. Ṣād In Tafsir Al-Ṭabarī.” ZAD Al-Mufassirin 6, no. 2 (30 Desember 2024): 248–69. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v6i2.240.

III, R. Michael McCoy. Interpreting the Qurʾān with the Bible (Tafsīr al-Qurʾān Bi-l-Kitāb): Reading the Arabic Bible in the Tafsīrs of Ibn Barraǧān and al-Biqāʿī. BRILL, 2021. google.

Iwanebel, Fejrian Yazdajird. “Kontribusi Pemikiran Jane Dammen Mcauliffe Terhadap Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Hadis, 2 Juli 2014. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/16206/.

Jaelani, Juhri, Syahidin Syahidin, dan Elan Sumarna. “Islam and Women’s Involvement in Education (Abu Syuqqah Thought Study in Taḥrīr al-Mar’ah Fī ‘Aṣr al-Risālah).” Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam 4, no. 2 (27 November 2021): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v4i2.93.

Khasanah, Mahfidhatul. “Epistemologi Pemikiran Jane Dammen McAuliffe Tentang Hubungan Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir.” Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara 8, no. 1 (29 Juni 2022): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v8i1.340.

Lukman, Fadhli. “Ayat-Ayat Perdamaian: Dekonstruksi Tafsir Ala Jane Dammen McAuliffe.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 14, no. 2 (22 Oktober 2013): 217–38. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v14i2.758.

Mawardi, Mawardi. “Kritik Riwayat Penafsiran Israiliyat Al-Tabari Tentang Kisah Nabi Yusuf Dalam Surat Yusuf Ayat 24.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 6, no. 3 (28 Desember 2022). https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.5283.

McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. “Reading the Qur’ān with Fidelity and Freedom.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 73, no. 3 (1 September 2005): 615–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfi072.

———, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’ān. 8th. print. Cambridge Companions to Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.google

———. “The Persistent Power of the Qur’?n.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 147, no. 4 (2003): 339–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1558297.

Mukholik, Ayis. “Herbert Berg dan Verifikasi Otentisitas Hadis Dalam Kitab Tafsir Jami’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 2, no. 1 (24 Agustus 2017): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v2i1.21-40.

Nur, Afrizal. “Infiltration Of Shia: Segmentation Of Al-Dakhiil In Intrepretation Of Al-Mishbah.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 23, no. 1 (14 Januari 2017): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v23i1.1076.

Putra, Alven. “The Prophet’s Household Problems and The Solving Method in Hadith.” AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 7, no. 1 (7 Juni 2022): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v7i1.4283.

“Qur’anic Christians: An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis, by Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Book Review) - ProQuest.” Diakses 27 Juni 2025. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5d944fac2c90d8d55f3db172b046cee7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1821138.

Rawzalgina, Arthi Amalia. “Revealing Akhbar Israiliyyat: Influence In Interpretation.” Proceeding International Conference On Islam, Law, And Society 4, no. 1 (24 Februari 2025). https://incoils.or.id/index.php/INCOILS/article/view/239.

Rippin, A. “Jane Dammen McAuliffe: Qur’ānic Christians: An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis, Xii, 340 Pp. Cambridge, Etc.: Cambridge University Press, 1991. £35, $49.50. - Neal Robinson: Christ in Islam and Christianity: The Representation of Jesus in the Qur’ān and the Classical Muslim Commentaries, Xi, 235 Pp. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1991. £40.” Bulletin of SOAS 55, no. 2 (Juni 1992): 321–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00004675.

Rizapoor, Habiburrahaman, dan Mohammad Tayeb Athar. “The Controversy Surrounding the Prophet’s Affliction with Magic: An Analytical Exploration of Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Among Islamic Scholars.” International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences 3, no. 2 (27 Oktober 2023). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.649.

Saleh, Fauzi. “The Role of Qur’anic Interpretation in Islamic Legal Reasoning.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif 21, no. 2 (13 Desember 2024): 270–82. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v21i2.25693.

Salman, Abdul Matin Bin. “The Feasibility of Isra’īliyyāt History in Interpretation Al-Qur’an.” Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies 6, no. 4 (15 Oktober 2023): 856–72. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.876.

Siregar, Bahaluddin. “Kajian Atas Tafsir Nabi Bermuka Masam Dalam Qs. ‘Abasa [80]: 1-16 (Kajian Komparatif Interpretasi Tafsir Ibn Katsȋr dan Tafsir Tabȃtaba`ȋ),” 2019. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/49917.

Sulistiyawati, Eka, dan Anni Anisa. “Al-Aşīl Wa al-Dakhīl: Sumber Autentik Dan Non-Autentik Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Al-Bunyan: Interdisciplinary Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 2, no. 2 (2024): 166–81. https://doi.org/10.61166/bunyan.v2i2.33.

Ṭabarī, Abū Ja‘far al-. Jāmi‘ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Vol. 20. ttp: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2000. google.

Ubaidillah, M. Burhanuddin, dan Nur Fatimatuz Zahro’. “Historitas Evolusi Sistem Kewarisan Islam : (Kajian Tematik Ayat-Ayat Waris Fase Pra Islam Dan Fase Madinah).” Usratuna: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 7, no. 2 (30 Juni 2024): 1–21. https://ejournal.staidapondokkrempyang.ac.id/index.php/usrotuna/article/view/594.

 

Published
2025-06-27