Metode, Pendekatan Ilmiah, Model Pemikiran Dan Teori Revolusi Paradigma Thomas Samuel Kuhn

  • Shelly Alvareza Zazkia UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Scientific Approach, Theory of Revolution Paradigm, Thomas Samuel Kuhn

Abstract

Thomas S. Khun made a big contribution to the history of the philosophy of science, namely the broad realization of the theories he initiated in the social sciences. In social sciences such as education or politics in terms of figure of speech or parallelism, Kuhn's theory has been added. Kuhn considers history as the main lens in an effort to study fundamentals via epistemology. The purpose of this research is to find out the biography of Thomas S Kuhn, to explore the philosophical basis of Thomas S Kuhn's thinking, to find out the type of Thomas S Kuhn's paradigm and to find out the contribution of Thomas S Kuhn's Paradigm . This article was compiled using the library research method or literature study. The results of the study show that the scientific dynamics of education is able to contextualize Thomas S. Kuhn's thoughts about the process of the birth of science to be able to reach and gain knowledge and knowledge through a combination of problem solving activities of an educator which has a major influence in helping students achieve their expectations.

References

Abrori, M. S., & Nurkholis, M. (2019). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Menurut Pandangan Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pengembangan PAI Di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Al-I’tibar : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 09–18. https://doi.org/10.30599/jpia.v6i1.419

Danandjaja, J. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Antropologi Indonesia. http://www.jurnalkesos.ui.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/viewArticle/3318

Digarizki, I., & Al Anang, A. (2020). Epistemologi Thomas S. Kuhn: Kajian Teori Pergeseran Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah. Jurnal Humanitas, 7(1). Google Scholar

Kesuma, U., & Hidayat, A. W. (2020). Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 166–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043

Kindi, V., & Arabatzis, T. (2013). Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions revisited. Routledge. Google Scholar

Komarudin, K. (2016). Falsifikasi Karl Popper Dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya Dalam Keilmuan Islam. At-Taqaddum, 6(2), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v6i2.720

Kuhn, S. Thomas.(1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Leiden: Instituut Voor Theoretische Biologie. Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Can theories be refuted? (pp. 205–259). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14

Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Muslih, M. (2004). FILSAFAT ILMU; Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma, dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan (Vol. 1, Issue 1). LESFI. Google Scholar

Nurkhalis, N. (2012). Konsep Epitemologi Paradigma Thomas Khun. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 14(2), 210–223. Google Scholar

Subekti, S. (2015). Filsafat Ilmu Karl R. Popper dan Thomas S. Kuhn serta Implikasinya dalam Pengajaran Ilmu. HUMANIKA, 22(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.22.2.39-46

Wiranata, R. R. S., Maragustam, & Abrori, M. S. (2021). Filsafat Pragmatisme: Meninjau Ulang Inovasi Pendidikan Islam. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2021.9.1.110-133

Zubaedi. (2020). Western Philosophy: From The New Logika Rene Descartes To The Revolution Of Thomas Kuhn Science. Ar-Ruzz Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043

Published
2021-07-31
How to Cite
Shelly Alvareza Zazkia. (2021). Metode, Pendekatan Ilmiah, Model Pemikiran Dan Teori Revolusi Paradigma Thomas Samuel Kuhn. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(3), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.51214/bip.v1i3.310