Metode, Pendekatan Ilmiah, Model Pemikiran Dan Teori Revolusi Paradigma Thomas Samuel Kuhn
Abstract
Thomas S. Khun made a big contribution to the history of the philosophy of science, namely the broad realization of the theories he initiated in the social sciences. In social sciences such as education or politics in terms of figure of speech or parallelism, Kuhn's theory has been added. Kuhn considers history as the main lens in an effort to study fundamentals via epistemology. The purpose of this research is to find out the biography of Thomas S Kuhn, to explore the philosophical basis of Thomas S Kuhn's thinking, to find out the type of Thomas S Kuhn's paradigm and to find out the contribution of Thomas S Kuhn's Paradigm . This article was compiled using the library research method or literature study. The results of the study show that the scientific dynamics of education is able to contextualize Thomas S. Kuhn's thoughts about the process of the birth of science to be able to reach and gain knowledge and knowledge through a combination of problem solving activities of an educator which has a major influence in helping students achieve their expectations.
References
Abrori, M. S., & Nurkholis, M. (2019). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Menurut Pandangan Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pengembangan PAI Di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Al-I’tibar : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 09–18. https://doi.org/10.30599/jpia.v6i1.419
Danandjaja, J. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Antropologi Indonesia. http://www.jurnalkesos.ui.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/viewArticle/3318
Digarizki, I., & Al Anang, A. (2020). Epistemologi Thomas S. Kuhn: Kajian Teori Pergeseran Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah. Jurnal Humanitas, 7(1). Google Scholar
Kesuma, U., & Hidayat, A. W. (2020). Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 166–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043
Kindi, V., & Arabatzis, T. (2013). Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions revisited. Routledge. Google Scholar
Komarudin, K. (2016). Falsifikasi Karl Popper Dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya Dalam Keilmuan Islam. At-Taqaddum, 6(2), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v6i2.720
Kuhn, S. Thomas.(1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Leiden: Instituut Voor Theoretische Biologie. Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Can theories be refuted? (pp. 205–259). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14
Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar
Muslih, M. (2004). FILSAFAT ILMU; Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma, dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan (Vol. 1, Issue 1). LESFI. Google Scholar
Nurkhalis, N. (2012). Konsep Epitemologi Paradigma Thomas Khun. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 14(2), 210–223. Google Scholar
Subekti, S. (2015). Filsafat Ilmu Karl R. Popper dan Thomas S. Kuhn serta Implikasinya dalam Pengajaran Ilmu. HUMANIKA, 22(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.22.2.39-46
Wiranata, R. R. S., Maragustam, & Abrori, M. S. (2021). Filsafat Pragmatisme: Meninjau Ulang Inovasi Pendidikan Islam. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2021.9.1.110-133
Zubaedi. (2020). Western Philosophy: From The New Logika Rene Descartes To The Revolution Of Thomas Kuhn Science. Ar-Ruzz Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043
Copyright (c) 2021 Shelly Alvareza Zazkia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BIP is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, according to which:
1) Authors retain copyright with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.